Can Geopolitical Crises Derail Green Transitions? Germany and Italy Show Diverging Paths
- Date 2025-10-27 11:00
- Hit833
🔌 Can Geopolitical Crises Derail Green Transitions? Germany and Italy Show Diverging Paths
“The Russia–Ukraine War didn’t just
destabilize energy markets. It reshaped the climate trajectories of Europe’s
largest economies.”
— Yeong Jae Kim
When energy security collides with
climate goals
In the wake of the Russia–Ukraine War,
Germany and Italy, two of Europe’s biggest economies, took drastically
different paths in their energy transitions. A new study reveals how the crisis
has pushed Germany toward coal, while Italy has diversified its gas imports and
maintained its decarbonization goals.
Germany: Coal use surged
Facing cutoffs in Russian gas and a nuclear
phase-out, Germany ramped up coal-fired power. This raised projected greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions by 60% compared to a scenario without the war. While
Germany continues to target 80% renewable energy by 2030, this backslide
highlights how energy security can conflict with decarbonization goals. This
highlights the need for faster renewable deployment and electricity grid
reform.
Italy: Resilience through
diversification
Italy cut Russian gas reliance from 40% to
25%, increased hydropower after a historic drought, and maintained renewable
investments through its €59B National Recovery Plan. GHG Emissions remained
stable, suggesting a more resilient transition.
🔬 How
they tested it
Using detailed electricity data and
time-series models, researchers forecasted 2023–2027 energy mixes and emissions
under “with war” and “without war” scenarios.
📌 Policy
takeaway
Germany needs faster renewable deployment
and grid reform to avoid coal dependency. Italy must resolve permitting
bottlenecks and bolster storage infrastructure to sustain progress.
📄 About
the Study
Title: Energy transitions post–Russia–Ukraine war: challenges and
policy implications in Germany and Italy
Authors: Yeong Jae Kim, Kyonggi Min, Seong-Hoon Cho
Journal: The Electricity Journal (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2025.107518
Data: Monthly generation stats (2015–2023) via ENTSO-E
Design: SARIMA model projections of emissions and electricity mix under
conflict and no-conflict scenarios